“I am getting stronger. The EMF is not pushing me around anymore. My body is once again sending the “energy of life” out through my cells. I don’t have to live with a just a trickle of energy anymore and I have only been taking it for 1 month! I can’t wait to see more!”
Studies on EMF clearly show the effects like symptoms of fatigue, headaches, insomina, heart rate variability, as well as memory, skin, eye, detox, digestion, & bowel function issues. This is a spectrum of symptoms which are difficult to observe in our daily life but are undeniably present.
Dr. Ruggiero’s research has built a bridge of products including Bravo Yogurt and Imuno which have been transformational to build and support our microbiomes and to ignite cellular power to restore our system’s functions. Praesidium® takes us a step further into becoming more resilient with EMF pollution. Dr. Ruggiero is a highly innovative thinker. He has offered a safe, smart, and natural formula that we can consume. We begin to transfer the messages of how WE can adapt to those super high levels of radiation right into our own cells and retain it.
Praesidium® consists of these specialized living probiotic organisms, specialized living silica and spirilina. The technology is patent pending. The doctor recommends not taking more than one capsule per day. The product contains a 3 month supply which is 90 caps. (members only: there is a sample section offering smaller amounts)
Feedback from people who have begun to experience the formula report:
Nutritional support for better nerves, micro-biome, skin & eyes
Better detoxification of pesticides and cleaners
Improved Heart Rate Variablity
Improved, healthier looking skin
Much better energy levels and detoxing
Over all less emotional stress
The Inventing of Praesidium: A speech in PDF form:
Imuno is a product that cleans small areas of your body so that it is completely clean. This takes energy! It also doesn’t last for more than a few days before it starts to get wobbly. It’s like rolling a hoola hoop. At first it rolls straight and strong. Then it slows down, starts to wobble, and it falls down. When you are taking the imuno to clean out the first small area, you will want to pay attention to those cycles. Strong, slower, wobbly. You will want to take it again before it falls and stops so that it can recover. Just like the game with the hoop and the stick, you will run along it and when it needs a boost, you hit to hoop with the stick and it gains speed. This is how you use imuno cream. You take a bit, the size of rice. You put it on an area to penetrate into the body the size of a small ball up to a bigger ball as you go along. Protect this area and keep it going. If you don’t the amebas will be waiting for the boundary of the space to weaken so they can take over your chemistry and electric battery.
I have included the Fourth Phase of Water because imuno works really well. So well that it is hard to comprehend or even understand. I moves the fluids, it removes the waste that the immune system doesn’t want and it leaves at least a small area of the body clean and clear of everything unwanted. I can’t make claims about what it does. This is my experience.
To understand it, I go to The Forth Stage of Water. Where it gets into making electrical charges at different levels and surfaces of the water. They actually had water working like tubes that resemble the veins. I am sure the lymph has a different function but it is all facinating.
If you apply these solutions of moving unwanted material with the electrical charges in the water of your body to bring about a surprisingly effective way to remove unwanted chemistry from your body. I am hoping that as you see the surprising element of water in your body, you will better understand that imuno is ORGANIZING YOU to remove your waste. All waste. Heavy metals, bugs, free radicals. Anything that the immune system considers an unwanted element. In my experience it is amazing and very helpful.
It is important to understand that it won’t remove everything from everywhere. Just what it has the energy to clean out each time. It can sustain the action and hold the area and it can re-energize and sustain the action by reapplication.
Further, it appears to correlate with the research from the “red-dye #2 and hyper-activity”. The researchers of the time broke that down to a deficit of sulfates. Not the mineral but the action of sulfates or “energetic sulfates.”
This is an article describing Red-Dye #2
This is me putting out how I am tying these element together. I know it works. I know the actions are basically “understood” in the above research. If you read Pollack, it took a year and a half to find the answer to the question “how does a water battery recharge.” Please understand that getting to the bottom of things is never possible, but understanding comes with long-term focused energy. (think crazy hair, black boards and arm chairs)
I know that imuno uses the charge in the smallest molecules to clear the way to remove the debris and what the immune system says should not be there. Therefore, I have used it as an antibiotic. It strengthens the cells under any infection, gets the area moving, and doesn’t disrupt the natural good beneficial bacteria. It avoids antibiotic damage.
You should not use it systemically at first in large amounts. It will take a lot of energy to set up a huge space!! Start small, watch it work like your wand and get the hang of it. Once your body is accustomed to the action, you will find much more cooperation. Also, you have to know when you have taken too much and you are a tiny bit groggy the next day. (for example, applying it to your entire face at one time.)
Cellfood is a remarkable formula that oxygenates and feeds the cells- cleaning, nourishing, and tuning up the body’s systems throughout the day. That’s why Cellfood is the world’s #1 selling oxygen + nutrient supplement- the original formula developed by Everett Storey almost 70 years ago.
For over 50 years, Cellfood’s proprietary formula has been manufactured by NuScience Corporation in an FDA-compliant facility, GMP-certified by the Natural Products Association.
Cellfood nourishes and oxygenates
It’s created by a proprietary process in which nutrient-rich plant substances are held in a negatively-charged suspension of deuterium sulfate. The result is a remarkable formulation that- by utilizing the same technology used decades ago to split the atom-splits water molecules within the body by weakening the bonding electrons, and gives birth to cascades of vital, life-giving oxygen. This newly-born oxygen, combined with an array of vital nutrients, is carried throughout he body-cleaning, toning and building the cells and tissues hour after hour, day after day.
A miracle of electromagnetic design
Since Cellfood is colloidal and negatively charged- just like the blood and lymph fluid- there is a natural synchronicity between Cellfood and the body’s own fluids. Cellfood and its nutrients move through the cell walls easily, and are absorbed and assimilated quickly and efficiently. Cellfood’s unique structure oxygenates and feeds the cells- cleaning, nourishing, and tuning up the body’s systems throughout the day. And, Cellfood helps balance the body’s pH.
Cellfood is exceptional as an overall delivery system not only for its own nutrients, but also for any other nutrients or substances introduced into the body within the same 24 hour period.
A powerful free-radical scavenger
Free radicals are atoms (or groups of atoms) that are missing an electron. These highly reactive molecules become even more dangerous in the human body when they react with and damage other important cellular components like DNA. Antioxidants are directly responsible for the prevention of cellular damage by neutralizing and eliminating free radicals. In a recent study, Cellfood was shown to decrease excess free radical activity by up to 27%.
Prized by athletes
In addition to the numerous general health benefits, Cellfood has now become the supplement of choice for many professional athletes. In a study conducted at the University of Pretoria, Cellfood was shown to increase oxygen uptake (VO2 Max), increase ferretin (iron storage), and decrease lactic acid (muscular fatigue).
Notably, Cellfood does not contain any ingredients that are on the lists of banned substances for professional and amateur athletic competitions. Cellfood is non-addictive, non-invasive, and completely non-toxic when taken as directed.
Cellfood lowers oxidative stress
An in vitro study conducted at the International Observatory of Oxidative Stress (Italy) showed Cellfood to be effective in the modulation of oxygen bioavailability in blood plasma and in lowering the risk of oxidative stress (the main cause of premature aging). Cellfood was found to have extraordinarily high biological antioxidant potential-a full 30 times higher than the normal BAP value of human plasma.
Conclusions of the study: “Cellfood is a natural formula with the ability to reduce oxidative stress and is potentially useful in the prevention of premature aging.”
Cellfood works throughout the day
When you mix Cellfood with purified water or juice and ingest it, its proprietary water-splitting action begins the moment you take the first sip. This cascading time release of oxygen typically peaks within 8-12 hours, and then keeps working hour after hour. And, its essential natural minerals, enzymes, amino acids and electrolytes are delivered simultaneously throughout the body on the deepest cellular level.
Directions for use
Adults take eight (8) drops in 8 ounces of purified water or juice, three (3) times per day. May be taken with or without meals. You may mix one day’s amount in a water bottle and sip throughout the day. No refrigeration required.
1-ounce bottle = 30-day supply
Cellfood comes in a 1-ounce bottle that provides a 30-day supply when taken as directed.
Some may experience a cleansing or detoxification response. If so, decrease dosage at beginning, then gradually resume full dosage.
Keep out of reach of children. Avoid eye contact; rinse well if dropped in eyes. If pregnant, nursing or under medical care, consult your health professional.
Care when pouring
Pour with care. Before Cellfood is mixed with water or juice, its beneficial organic enzymes can compromise countertops, clothing and other surfaces. Store bottle on tray.
Cellfood has been formulated in a special gel base for external topical use— Cellfood Oxygen Gel. This remarkable gel is made from Cellfood proprietary blend, aloe vera, lavender blossom extract and glycerine.
These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If under medical care, or if pregnant or nursing, please consult a health professional.
An overview of the rapidly emerging public health issue from cell phones, wireless devices and wireless infrastructure— and how the growth in these technologies is a little understood driver of poor health outcomes and costs.
National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy
The article, “The Wireless Elephant in the Room” was written by Camilla Rees, MBA, Senior Policy Advisor, National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy and Founder, ElectromagneticHealth.org.
National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy
The National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy (NISLAPP) was founded in 1978 to bridge the gap between scientific uncertainties and the need for lawsprotecting public health and safety. Its overriding objective is to bring practitioners of science and law together to develop intelligent policy that best serves all interested parties in a given controversy. Its focus is on the points at which these two disciplines converge.
The Wireless Elephant
We would certainly all agree that health and environmental consciousness has been increasing over the past two decades. Organic foods, yoga centers, mind body programs, health clubs and the healing arts have proliferated. Even healthy ‘fast food’ restaurants have arrived, and large food brands are beginning to go GMO-free. As consumers, we are increasingly making ‘green’ choices that support mother Earth, and which respect our intrinsic relationship with it.
Why then, despite all this interest in health and in living ‘green’, do we have over 133 million people with a chronic illness in the U.S.— approximately 45% of the population1, and growing? Promotion of ‘prevention,’ and, more recently, ‘rationing’ care, has been the response to high costs driven by chronic illnesses. But in looking for solutions to costs, we may be ‘missing the forest for the trees’, and also not understanding the true meaning of prevention.
The word ‘prevention’ rings hollow unless one is seeking to eliminate the factors that can lead to disease in the first place. These include unhealthy lifestyle choices, how we respond to stress, heavy metal and chemical toxicity, exposures to electromagnetic fields (EMFs), petroleum-based fertilizers, the weed killer glyphosate, GMO
foods, poor nutrition, difficult relationships, etc. Today, ‘prevention’ instead typically means early detection of disease with tests like mammography, pap smear and PSA; manipulation of one’s physiology with pharmaceuticals and vaccines (which can have their own negative side effects); and, perhaps, depending on the doctor, advice to eat more vegetables and exercise. But prevention in the full sense of the word means something else entirely, and we ignore this at our peril.
True prevention means first removing from our lives those things that create biological dis-regulation and dis-ease, while identifying and proactively increasing the things that create balance and wellness.
The word ‘prevention’ rings hollow unless one is seeking to eliminate the factors that can lead to disease in the first place.
The Unseen Elephant
A health care system that does not advocate for dramatic reduction in cell phone and wireless radiation exposures ignores over six decades of scientific research showing biological and health effects from electromagnetic fields, including recent research from the NIH.2 3 It ignores repeated resolutions from scientists and physicians worldwide calling for caution, and the classification of cell phone and wireless radiation (radiofrequency radiation or RFR) by the WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as a ‘Possible Carcinogen’ (Group 2B)4. It ignores the experience of people in
every corner of the globe with life-altering, sometimes debilitating, symptoms from acute and chronic exposures to wireless technologies. And, it turns a blind eye to the DNA-damage consequences of these wireless conveniences for ourselves today, as well as for future generations.
In parallel with the growth of chronic illnesses since the 1990s, it is hard not to notice that the amount of wireless communication infrastructure in our midst has been exploding. Four and a half billion people use a cell phone today, whereas in the early 1990s most people didn’t own a cell phone. There are now millions of cell towers radiating the planet, many hundreds of millions WiFi networks5 and billions of wireless devices connected to them.6
In parallel with the growth of chronic illnesses
since the 1990s, it is hard not to notice that the amount of wireless communication infrastructure in our midst has been exploding.
Certainly, there has also been growth in other environmental pollutants during this period, and many people are over-drugged and suffer from drug interactions, with costly side effects, that also drive total costs. For example, on average, individuals 65 to 69 years old take nearly
14 prescriptions per year.7 But, as a society, we are not fully ‘seeing’ the important EMF issue in the background, which has direct effects on biology and leads to a wide range of acute and chronic health issues.
In addition to the many known biological effects, EMFs also have interactive effects with man-made chemicals, heavy metals and microorganisms in our bodies, and with metal implants and amalgams, exacerbating the biological effects. And, importantly, unknown to most people, radiofrequency radiation can impact drug actions. The radiation can both enhance and decrease the efficacy of a drug, impacting the drug actions of amphetamines, anxiolytics, opiates and alcohol to
name just a few.8 Few prescribing physicians are focused on this, or asking patients who take pharmaceutical drugs about their exposures to wireless devices and infrastructure. Overprescribing pharmaceuticals to address electrosensitivity symptoms is one of the resulting travesties, and drugs will never solve the problem.
Stressing Our Biology
Our bodies are attempting to cope in an entirely different milieu than the one in which most adults today were raised. Biology is being continually stressed from the acute and cumulative effects of these pulsing energy fields, and responds by creating stress proteins, as with any other kind of stressor. Is it any wonder, then, that the incidence
of chronic illness has accelerated since the early 1990s along side the rapid proliferation of these technologies?
Here is a graph showing six hours of radiofrequency radiation exposures to an individual in New York City wearing a portable dosimeter on March 1, 2016. The graph shows the extraordinary density of electromagnetic field exposures of different kinds, the variable nature of the pulsing and peaks, and that exposures today are way above safety guidelines based on biological scientific evidence9 (peaking, in this particular case, in fact, way above the top of the graph).
Our bodies are attempting to cope in an entirely different milieu than the one in which most adults today were raised…Biology is being continually stressed from the acute and cumulative effects of these pulsing energy fields.
and metabolic conditions. In children, we are seeing increases in psychiatric disorders, psychotropic medication use, chronic medical conditions, delinquency, addictions, aggression, sensory integration issues, and disability filings.10 And we are seeing a growing number of reproductive issues and decreased fertility.11
The BioInitiative Report (much of which was later published in Pathophysiology) synthesizes the key findings of thousands of scientific studies showing biological effects from electromagnetic fields.12 The U.K. publication, Electromagnetic Sensitivity and Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity, available through E.S.-U.K.13 contains references to 1,800 studies showing effects of low-intensity exposures. There exists decades of military Radiofrequency (RF) research showing risk, much foreign research, and even an industry-funded review, “Mobile Telecommunications and Health,” prepared by the Ecolog Institute, which was issued in 2000 and lays out the known risks in great detail, including DNA risks, cancer risks and risks to children.14
The International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety (ICEMS) and the National Institute for the Study and Control of Cancer and Environmental Diseases ‘Bernardino Ramazzini’, published a report, “Non-thermal Effects and Mechanisms of Interaction Between Electromagnetic Fields and Living Matter” in 2010. This was an international effort by scientists to compile what was known at that time about the biological effects and mechanisms of action, and included studies showing EMFs create oxidative stress, blood-brain
It should be noted that since the 1990s we have seen tremendous growth in neurological and psychological disorders, such as depression and bipolar disease, autoimmune diseases, inflammatory conditions, autism, ADHD, sleep disorders, chronic fatigue, diabetes
Dosimetry – 6 Hours in New York City View 7 — Scale .2 mW/m2
0.003 to 0.006 mW/m2 BioIni0a0ve Safe Exposure Guideline
( 2012 Outdoor ; Indoor level one-tenth of this )
“In children, we are seeing increases in psychiatric disorders, psychotropic medication use, chronic medical conditions, delinquency, addictions, aggression, sensory integration issues, and disability filings.”
barrier permeability, genotoxic and fertility effects, heat shock (or stress) proteins, changes in the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and in neurotransmitters, and much more.15
The millions of magnetic crystals per gram of brain tissue that orient us to the Earth’s magnetic field (as high as 100 million crystals per gram in brain membranes) are also affected by artificial electromagnetic fields and are believed to be playing a role, as well, in the biological dis-regulation occurring.16
More recently, Dr. Martin Pall, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University, has built a case that Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel (VGCC) activation in cells from low-intensity EMFs, such as those emitted by cell phones, wireless devices and wireless infrastructure, is a primary mechanism of biological dysfunction. He believes the VGCC activation in cells can explain long-reported association between electromagnetic fields and a wide range of biological changes and health effects, including17:
3) Cardiac effects influencing the electrical control of the heart, including changes in ECGs producing arrhythmias, changes that can be life threatening. 4) Chromosome breaks and other changes in chromosome structure. 5) Histological changes in the testes. 6) Cell death (what is now called apoptosis, a process important in neurodegenerative diseases). 7) Lowered male fertility including lowered sperm quality and function and also lowered female fertility (less studied). 8) Oxidative stress. 9) Changes in calcium fluxes and calcium signaling. 10) Cellular DNA damage including single strand breaks and double strand breaks in cellular DNA and also 8-OHdG in cellular DNA. 11) Cancer which is likely to involve these DNA changes but also increased rates of tumor promotion-like events. 12) Therapeutic effects including stimulation of bone growth.
1) Various neuropsychiatric effects, including changes in brain structure and function, changes in various types of psychological responses and changes in behavior. 2) At least eight different endocrine (hormonal) effects.
“We’re clearly at a point where we can confidently debunk the industry’s argument of more than 20 years that there cannot be a biological mechanism of action from these low-intensity EMFs.”
Professor Emeritus in Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences Washington State University
—Martin Pall, PhD
13) Cataract formation (previously thought to be thermal, now known not to be). 14) Breakdown of the blood-brain barrier. 15) Melatonin depletion and sleep disruption.
Dr. Pall says, “We’re clearly at a point where we can confidently debunk the industry’s argument of more than 20 years that there cannot be a biological mechanism of action from these low-intensity EMFs. According to industry, the forces electromagnetic fields place on electrically-charged groups in the cell are too weak to produce biological effects. However, the unique structural properties of the VGCC protein can, it turns out, explain why the force on a cell’s voltage sensor from low-intensity EMFs are millions of times stronger than are the forces on singly-charged groups elsewhere in the cell.18 They may be low intensity but with regard to the VGCCs, can have a tremendously powerful impact on the cell. Furthermore, published studies showing that calcium channel blocker drugs block or greatly lower biological effects from electromagnetic fields confirm there is a voltage-gated calcium channel mechanism that is occurring.”19
While there may be other mechanisms which can lead to biological effects from EMFs, we now know that activation of the VGCC is at least one very important factor that can lead to a range of effects.
Is it not time we start to pay attention, and think more about the ‘Wireless Elephant’ in the room if we want to get people well and lower health care costs?
After all, we have over half a century of science showing biological effects, while radiation exposures continue to grow ever more pervasive and more powerful.
Are we afraid, I wonder, to recognize this elephant?
“With dramatic increases in reported ASCs (autism spectrum conditions) that are coincident in time with the deployment of wireless technologies, we need aggressive investigation of potential ASC–EMF/RFR links”.
Assistant Professor of Neurology, Harvard Medical School; Pediatric Neurologist and Neuroscientist, Mass General Hospital; and Author, The Autism Revolution: Whole Body Strategies for Making Life All It Can Be
—Martha Herbert, MD
Experts are Warning
Indeed, it took decades to have the truth emerge on risks from tobacco, asbestos, and lead paint, but in the case of electromagnetic fields experts warn that, because of the ubiquitous exposures, we must act with urgency to prevent consequences of potentially catastrophic proportions.
Ominously, in 2013, Harvard autism expert, Martha Herbert, MD, published an article indicating that the very same biological changes happening in autism happen with electromagnetic field exposures.20
She says the evidence is sufficient now to warrant new public exposure standards, and strong, interim precautionary practices. “With dramatic increases in reported ASCs (autism spectrum conditions) that are coincident in time with the deployment of wireless technologies, we need aggressive investigation of potential ASC–EMF/RFR links”, says Dr. Herbert.
Autism now affects approximately 1 in 50 school age children21, up from 1 in 1,500 in the 1990s, when the widespread proliferation of antenna infrastructure began.22 MIT Senior Research Scientist Stephanie Seneff of MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory projects 1 in 2 children will be on the autism spectrum by 2032. If there is even a small chance EMFs could be playing a role in the growth of autism, along with other factors, like vaccines, mercury and glyphosate, the topic certainly deserves our immediate attention, given the condition’s continued non-stop growth and the seriously alarming projections.
Dr. Herbert says, “EMF/RFR from WiFi and cell towers can exert a disorganizing effect on the ability to learn and remember, and can also be destabilizing to immune and metabolic functions. This will make it harder for some children to learn, particularly those who are already having problems in the first place.”
Beyond RF impacts on attention, memory, and behavior, in extreme cases, children are exhibiting signs of “digital dementia”, where
“I can say with conviction, in light of the science, and in particular in light of the cellular and DNA science, which has been my focus at Columbia University for several decades, putting radiating antennas in schools (and in close proximity to developing children) is an uninformed choice.”
—Martin Blank, PhD
Department of Physiology & Cellular Biophysics Columbia University
overuse of technology leads to symptoms comparable to dementia in the elderly.23 We should be aghast that this is occurring to children, and that companies are allowed to push wireless technology on them without regard to the short- or long-term consequences.
In commercial or industrial grade WiFi, found in schools, where the RF radiation is designed to be strong enough to easily go through cement walls, and to handle dozens to hundreds of users, the rate of cardiac arrest in children can be 40x the expected rate. Instead of addressing increasing incidence of heart irregularities in children by turning off the WiFi, some schools are sheepishly addressing the problem by installing defibrillators.24 This is clearly no solution.
There is a statistically significant increased risk for brain cancer from cell phone use, enough to now upgrade the IARC classification to Group 1 ‘Carcinogen’ from ‘Possible Carcinogen’ according to recently published studies.25 Young people who begin using cell phones heavily before age 20 have four to five times more risk of brain cancer by their late 20s.26 Risk has been shown to increase with years and total hours of use, as would be expected.
David Carpenter, MD, Director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University at Albany, a former New York State Department of Health official who ran the state’s largest public health laboratory, and who was previously Dean of the
School of Public Health at the University at Albany/SUNY, says, “There is clear and strong evidence that intensive use of cell phones increases the risk of brain cancer, tumors of the auditory nerve and cancer of the parotid gland, the salivary gland in the cheek by the ear.”
In a letter to a school Board of Trustees, Martin Blank, PhD, of the Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics at Columbia University, and author of “Overpowered: The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation (EMF) and What You Can Do About It,” says, “I can say with conviction, in light of the science, and in particular in light of the cellular and DNA science, which has
We are allowing the population to be continually exposed to biologically disturbing wireless technologies that can make people tired, irritable, distracted, depressed, anxious, addicted, unproductive, unfriendly, and feeling like “zombies”, and that can also lead to many illnesses, including many serious and life-threatening ones, like brain tumors and other cancers. Significant harm is being done to our society biologically, psychologically, spiritually and economically right before our eyes.
been my focus at Columbia University for several decades, putting radiating antennas in schools (and in close proximity to developing children) is an uninformed choice.” He adds, “Assurances that the antennas are within ‘FCC guidelines’ is meaningless today, given that it is now widely understood that the methodology used to assess exposure levels only accounts for one type of risk from antennas, the thermal effect from the power, not the other known risks, such as non-thermal frequencies, pulsing, signal characteristics, etc. They fail also to consider multiple simultaneous exposures from a variety of sources in the environment, and cumulative exposures over a lifetime. Compliance with FCC guidelines, thus, unfortunately, is not in any way an assurance of safety today, as the guidelines are fundamentally flawed.” 27
In 2015, 190 EMF scientists from 39 countries sent an International EMF Scientist Appeal to the United Nations, saying the World Health Organization has an internal conflicting stance on risks from electromagnetic fields, that needs strengthening, calling for protection of humans and wildlife.28 Columbia’s Dr. Martin Blank was the Appeal’s spokesperson. Watch video here:
To date, there is evidence of a connection between electromagnetic fields and nine cancers: Glioma (brain cancer), Acoustic Neuroma (tumor on acoustic nerve), Meningioma (tumor of the meninges), Salivary Gland cancer (parotid gland in cheek), Eye Cancer, Testicular Cancer, Leukemia, Thyroid Cancer and Breast Cancer. In five of these cancers, the RF-cancer connection has now been identified in multiple studies and in multiple countries.29
To date, there is evidence of a connection between electromagnetic fields and nine cancers: Glioma(brain cancer), Acoustic Neuroma (tumor on acoustic nerve), Meningioma (tumor of the meninges), Salivary Gland cancer (parotid gland in cheek), Eye Cancer, Testicular Cancer, Leukemia, Thyroid Cancer and Breast Cancer.
—L. Lloyd Morgan
Senior Research Fellow Environmental Health Trust
Approximately 3-5% of people are also estimated to be electrically sensitive in developed countries,30 with up to 35% mildly electrically sensitive.
Overall, the risks and warnings from scientists the world over do not paint a pretty picture, given that billions of people are now using cell phones and wireless devices, while mistakenly thinking they are safe. Wireless radiation is blanketing employees in offices, the sick in hospitals, travelers in hotels, schoolchildren in schools, people in their homes and bedrooms, and even newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit at one Los Angeles hospital.31
Young people of childbearing age have no idea that a fetus’ exposure to RF radiation in utero can lead to biological effects, such as effects on the brain and on organs,32 and to greater instances of emotional and social difficulties later in childhood.33 Young men don’t know that they regularly incur risks to fertility by placing a cell phone in their pants pocket.34 Elders sleeping near a WiFi router, or near a portable phone, have not been told these exposures can impact cognitive function, or lead to heart irregularities and accelerated aging.35
In this video on risks from electromagnetic fields in pregnancy, The Baby Safe Project,36 a collaboration between Grassroots Environmental Education and Environmental Health Trust, features Yale University’s Chair of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and Professor of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Dr. Hugh Taylor; Dr. Devra Davis of Environmental Health Trust; and Dr. Leo Trasande from NYU Langone School of Medicine.
Young people of childbearing age have no idea that a fetus’ exposure to RF radiation in utero can lead to biological effects, such as effects on the brain
and on organs32, and to greater instances of emotional and social difficulties later in childhood33. Young men don’t know they regularly incur risks to fertility by placing a cell phone in their pants pocket.34 Elders sleeping near a WiFi router, or near a portable phone, have not been told these exposures can impact cognitive function, or lead to heart irregularities and accelerated aging.35
People of childbearing age will want to listen carefully to what these experts are saying, and to hear about Dr. Taylor’s research in animals showing association between cell phone exposure in utero and symptoms similar to ADHD in offspring.
Devra Davis, PhD says, “Growing evidence tells us that men who want to father healthy babies should follow manufacturers advice and keep phones out of their pockets. Pregnancy is also a time of obvious vulnerability, which is why growing numbers of physicians advise young women to avoid direct exposure to their abdomens of the microwave radiation from cell phones and other wireless transmitting devices.” She adds, “People have a fundamental right to know why and how to protect their capacity to have children when and if they choose to do so.”
Why is mainstream media ignoring the EMF science when so many people, across all ages, are at risk?
Path of Darkness
Technology developers and manufacturers are also now developing the coming ‘Internet of Things’(IoT), where appliances and equipment in our lives will be wirelessly communicating constantly in our homes, but this bodes poorly for health, adding to the present exposures. Why would we want to have wireless radiation from multiple electronics blanketing us in the sanctuary of our home, and without the ability to ever turn them off? Not only is this a health issue, but it is a privacy issue, giving third parties opportunities to study our behaviors in detail, for their commercial purposes.
The FCC has given the green light to move forward with 5th generation (5G) wireless technology, saying it is in the interest of U.S. ‘economic activity,’ and it recently reallocated parts of the spectrum for it. 5G will utilize ultra-high frequencies (24 to 100+ GHz compared to 2.4 and 5 GHz currently used). Ultra-high frequencies are being permitted, despite research on 2G (GSM) technology showing risks for brain and heart tumors in federal government animal studies; despite 3G (UMTS) technology, though 1000x lower power than 2G, demonstrating several times the cancer risk compared to 2G,37 ostensibly due to factors other than power, such as modulation (which has been shown to impact
Why would we want to have wireless radiation from multiple electronics blanketing us in the sanctuary of our home, and without the ability to ever turn them off? Not only is this a health issue, but it is a privacy issue, giving third parties opportunities to study our behaviors, in detail, for their commercial purposes.
DNA repair genes38); and, despite no health research having yet been conducted on 4G. Nonetheless, outgoing FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler says the country will be covered in a massive deployment of new 5G small cells, on which there has also been no health research. While smaller cells may not be as visible to the public as large cell towers, their presence—and radiation—will be ubiquitous and potentially much more dangerous and biologically disruptive than the radiation we experience today.39
It is estimated the 5G market, well underway by developers now, will grow to hundreds of millions of dollars in the next decade.
Of equal concern, large media companies like SpaceX, Google, Facebook, OneWeb, and Outernet are planning to launch WiFi from the air and space, using satellites, balloons and drones. The Google Loon project is an example.40
This type of out-of-the-box R&D may give tech employees a sense of purpose, with the novelty being a welcomed stimulant, perhaps, but the real value in connecting all material things in our lives, or in using space for communications, interfering with the atmosphere, when far safer and more energy-efficient hard-wired options exist, has yet to
be explained. For our health, of course, we would want to be pushing entirely different ‘edges’, such as developing meaningful connections among people, and communities, not inanimate machines, and restoring our lost relationship with nature, while using the safer, faster and more secure wired technology options that are readily available.
It appears many in technology circles really don’t understand this, for they seem to regularly mistake what is only a facsimile of interconnection for our real potential in this regard. There is no intrinsic value in ‘integrating us with our information,’ or in tethering us to our devices, or in giving data companies the ability to analyze us for their commercial gain, all while using a tremendous amount of energy to sustain wireless equipment and to store data. Product development should instead aim, fundamentally, to meet a market need, while being mindful of health, and of environmental and social impacts.
We are in a new business era, and companies will increasingly be called to account for evidence of social responsibility. We are seeing
There is no intrinsic value in ‘integrating us with our information,’ or in tethering us to our devices, or in giving data companies the ability to analyze us for their commercial gain, while using a tremendous amount of energy to sustain wireless equipment and to store data.
this in the loud demands for non-GMO food, for transparency in product ingredients, in the fair trade movement, in calls for vaccine injury accountability, and, for example, recently in the market response to the first interactive, internet-connected Barbie doll, ‘Hello Barbie’. Hello Barbie was lambasted by irate parents over privacy and security concerns, designated “Worst Toy of the Year” by Campaign for Commercial Free Childhood41 and flopped in the marketplace, achieving only a small fraction of predicted sales.
There are many international groups now calling for wireless companies and their executives to be brought before the International Criminal Court at the Hague for crimes against humanity, as well more and more academics voicing concern about the effects of overuse of technology, and internet addiction, in our culture. And yet ironically, some technology executives who seduce us into thinking non-stop, biologically-disruptive communications technology is actually desirable probably believe that they are doing us a favor. The myopia, and focus on growth at any cost, is profound. As a society, we need to be asking what is at the root of this myopia. How did it happen that so many in technology circles are overlooking one of the most important aspects of life—health—seemingly in denial that we are electromagnetic ourselves? Can it really be only about the greed?
Waking Up—Before the Tipping Point
The day will arrive when the profound injury to our lives and future generations from wireless technologies will be known, including not just the biological and health effects, and links to disease, but the psychological effects, like poorly developed self-worth, and other effects, such as compulsive behaviors, addiction and isolation. We are being conditioned like rats on a treadmill, increasingly addicted to technology and unable to stop taking the drug. Many children have never known the quality of life possible un-tethered to the non-stop universe. They don’t know peace, or the sense of safety and inner guidance possible in complete stillness, when one is deeply connected to the natural world, or in community, and not connected to man-made electronics.
What we are increasingly sacrificing in the modern wireless world are relationships of meaning and fulfillment among people, and the awareness that humans and the ecosystem are intended to live in an
The myopia, and focus on growth at any cost, is profound. As a society we need to be asking what is at the root of this myopia. How did it happen that so many in technology circles are overlooking one of the most important aspects of life—health— seemingly in denial that we are electromagnetic ourselves?
active, living, supportive and joyful relationship. Instead, many people, including children, are attached to the stimulant of technology, ‘eating the apple’ so to speak, ignoring the Garden of Eden before us. We are on a path of decay and decline, and will remain on this path as long as we are still captured by, and addicted to, the stimuli.
A day of reckoning will arrive. Like with young children without impulse control, individuals, adults and children alike, will have to learn their own lessons on this the hard way, seeing the most important things evaporate, beginning with relationships and support systems. This is already happening across all age groups. For all of the ‘interconnectedness’ promised by technology, people appear less connected in the true sense of the word, and lonelier than ever.
And it is not just humans who are hurting from exposures to radiation. In 2014, the U.S. Department of the Interior said that the FCC standards for radiofrequency radiation do not adequately protect wildlife. This was a watershed moment. I continue to wonder when public sector leaders in this country will not only acknowledge the impact of this radiation on humans, animals, plants and the ecosystem (in droves), but act on it with urgency. What do people have their minds on that could be more important than a foreboding human health and environmental catastrophe from electromagnetic fields that will ultimately impact our sustainability? Indeed, we need a complete rethinking of the way we live on this Earth, in so many regards.
It is important to understand that the evidence for biological effects from this radiation is not new. Evidence of harm dates back decades to military research, decades before there even was a consumer cell phone or wireless industry. It may not have mattered so much in the early years of these technologies, when users were in military settings, and the exposures were not at all widespread. But today, we are living in a dense sea of radiation, day and night. And exposures are accelerating at a rapid pace, and will continue to get worse unless people, including policymakers, unite to question what is happening in our living environment.
The list of known biological effects is now very long, and presents a compelling rationale for rapidly scrapping the way the FCC assesses cell phone and wireless safety, and for developing exposure guidelines
The day will arrive when the profound injury to our lives and future generations from wireless technologies will be known, including not just the biological and health effects, and links to disease, but the psychological effects, like poorly developed self-worth, and other effects, such as compulsive behaviors, addiction and isolation.
that consider not only any thermal effects of the radiation, but the non-thermal (non-heating), and other effects, as well. Martin Blank, PhD and Reeba Goodman, PhD of Columbia University have wisely suggested using changes in DNA biochemistry as a definitive measure of risk across all the different types of frequencies.42
Given that we have FCC regulators with links to the wireless industry and significant conflicts of interest, prospects for voluntary change at the FCC are slim. It will likely be the legal system that will ultimately drive change.
A case under the Americans with Disabilities Act is underway in Massachusetts by parents of a 12-year-old experiencing electrosensitivity symptoms from 5Ghz WiFi at a private school,seeking accommodation for the child. Expert hearings are expected to be completed shortly, and a judicial decision will be made on whether the science is substantial enough to support the condition ‘electrosensitivity’. The lawsuit would then proceed to either a judicial decision or a jury trial.
In a multi-party lawsuit on cell phone risks (Murray et al v. Motorola et al) in 2014, Judge Frederick H. Weisberg, said:
“If there is even a reasonable possibility that cell phone radiation is carcinogenic, the time for action in the public health and regulatory sectors is upon us. Even though the financial and social cost of restricting such devices would be significant, those costs pale in comparison to the cost in human lives from doing nothing, only
to discover thirty or forty years from now that the early signs were pointing in the right direction. If the probability of carcinogenicity is low, but the magnitude of the potential harm is high, good public policy dictates that the risk should not be ignored.”
But we cannot afford to wait for government, the legal system, or the health care system to effectively respond before acting to protect and preserve our biology. People can do a lot now preventatively to protect health, if they understand the risks, while also encouraging an appropriate response from our government, especially Congress. See 50+ EMF Safety Tips and Insights (http://tinyurl.com/nmbyqhs) and For Parents to Know (http://tinyurl.com/hedbvxl).
In a multi-party lawsuit on cell phone risks (Murray et al v. Motorola et al) in 2014, Judge Frederick H. Weisberg, said:
“If there is even a reasonable possibility that cell phone radiation is carcinogenic, the time for action in the public health and regulatory sectors is upon us. Even though the financial and social cost of restricting such devices would be significant, those costs pale in comparison to the cost in human lives from doing nothing, only to discover thirty or forty years from now that the early signs were pointing in the right direction. If the probability of carcinogenicity is low, but the magnitude of the potential harm is high, good public policy dictates that the risk should not be ignored.”
Connection to Costs
So let’s turn back to prevention, and our health care system. Presently, we are paying for a bloated, expensive, pharmaceutical and treatment- oriented health care system that is not educating people about the need to minimize exposures to wireless radiation (or other environmental factors) when a lot of peoples’ problems stem from these exposures. Instead, we wait until the symptoms appear and then treat them with pharmaceuticals, modulating physiology, but never addressing the roots of the problem. This is a no-win situation.
People are given sleeping pills, for example, instead of being told to try turning off the wireless router, or heart medications, instead of being told wireless radiation can lead to heart irregularities (in one study increasing the heart rate in 40% of subjects—almost doubling the rate in one subject)43. Children by the millions are being given ADHD medications, while increasingly tethered to biologically disturbing wireless devices that could be contributing to attention difficulties. Homeowners across the country do not know the new radiating utility meters are making them sick, or that they can, in many cases, opt-out.44 The list goes on. Our health is being eroded by these exposures, yet many are under our daily control.
In a Harvard Safra Center for Ethics report, “Captured Agency: How the Federal Communications Commission is Dominated by the Industries it Presumably Regulates,” the authors said ‘public ignorance’ is the best ally of industry. But this ignorance aboutwireless impacts won’t last. People are increasingly motivated to find solutions to their health challenges themselves, in part due to the new, very high deductible insurance plans. This is good. As health costs rise higher and higher, sooner or later more and more people will likely
connect the dots between a wide range of health challenges and wireless devices and infrastructure—ranging from inflammation-related problems, like joint pain, to
neurological diseases, heart irregularities, brain tumors, low fertility, and cancers—and decide to minimize their personal exposures.
Significant harm is being done to our society biologically, psychologically, spiritually and economically right before our eyes.
While the new health insurance mandate aims to assure the health care system can be there for people’s health care costs, such as expensive (and for most people, prohibitive) hospitalization costs, capping patients annual out-of-pocket costs, the system certainly isn’t serving patients’ interests in prevention now, or attempting to understand the root sources of imbalance driving the growth in chronic illnesses in the first place, such as electromagnetic fields. It’s worthwhile to attempt to make care affordable for people, but the current approach is trying to patch the health care system way downstream, well after many, if not most, illnesses could have been prevented.
Only when we start focusing on root sources of imbalances, like EMFs, as well as food and water toxicity, chemicals in every day products, GMOs, glyphosate, pharmaceuticals, vaccines, poor nutrition, etc., and decide to teach people how to live healthily, will we be offering
the quality of care that has a chance of actually getting people better. Otherwise, without telling people the truth on these matters, we’ve essentially given up on peoples’ health potential from the get-go.
When it comes to EMFs, we are allowing the population to be continually exposed to biologically disturbing wireless technologies that can make people tired, irritable, distracted, depressed, anxious, addicted, unproductive, unfriendly, and feeling like ‘zombies’, and that can lead to many illnesses, including many serious and life-threatening ones, like brain tumors. Significant harm is being done to our society biologically, psychologically, spiritually and economically right before our eyes. A poll by Common Sense Media reported on by CNN recently indicated half of teenagers believe they are addicted to their smart phones.45
Isn’t it time we courageously acknowledge the damaging impact of cell phones and wireless technologies, and find a new path forward?
Why should we, in essence, be agreeing to be the collateral damage of the wireless industry’s misguided values that are damaging humans, animals and nature, and especially children, on an unprecedented scale, for their commercial gain?
I encourage all to stand up for health, start asking questions and demand that this dark industry, that is propagating illness and death, be properly regulated to protect our health and that of future generations.
The Author: Camilla Rees, MBA is an internationally respected researcher and educator on the biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields, and co-author of “Public Health SOS: The Shadow Side of the Wireless Revolution”. She founded ElectromagneticHealth.org (www.ElectromagneticHealth.org) and Campaign for Radiation Free Schools (Facebook), and co-founded the International
EMF Alliance. Camilla is a Senior Policy Advisor to the National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy; Advisory Board member of the International Institute for Building-BiologyTM & Ecology; a Voting Member of the U.S. Health Freedom Congress; and EMF Advisor to Citizens for Health, Radiation Research Trust (U.K.) and Mercola.com.
1. Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease report http://www.fightchronicdisease.org/ sites/default/files/docs/GrowingCrisisofChronicDiseaseintheUSfactsheet_81009.pdf
2. Scientific American, May 27, 2016. http://www.scientificamerican.com/ article/major-cell-phone-radiation-study-reignites-cancer-questions/
3. BioInitiative and Ecolog Reports. Thousands of studies showing biological effects from low intensity radiation were synthesized in the BioInitiative Report (last update 2012, 2014) (www.BioInitiative.org). Many other reviews of the science exist, such as the Ecolog Report, a review commissioned
by T-Mobile and Deutsche Telecom MobilNet GmbH, prepared in 2000, which outlined much of the science showing biological effects from cell phone radiation, including gene toxicity, impacts on cellular processes, effects on the immune system, central nervous system, hormone systems and connections with cancer and infertility (http://bemri.org/hese-uk/ en/niemr/ecologsumd240.html?content_type=&style=print).
4. WHO/IARC Classified Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields as Possibly Carcinogenic to Humans, http://electromagnetichealth. org/electromagnetic-health-blog/iarc-rf-carc/
5. Map of global WiFi Networks from Space. http://www.businessinsider. com/wi-fi-map-of-largest-cities-in-the-world-2015-9
Information Week http://www.informationweek.com/mobile/mobile-devices/ gartner-21-billion-iot-devices-to-invade-by-2020/d/d-id/1323081
34. Letter to Parents on Fertility and Other Risks to Children from Wireless Technologies by Camilla Rees of ElectromagneticHealth.org, http:// electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/letter-to-parents/
35. Rapid Aging Syndrome video by Magda Havas, PhD, https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=6z9Dpe66SzE&feature=player_embedded#at=14
36. The BabySafe Project, http://www.babysafeproject.org/the-science/ 37. Mercola.com, http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2015/01/06/
cell-phone-use-brain-cancer-risk.aspx ; International Journal of
Oncology http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3829779/ 38. IY Belyaev, Impairment of DNA Repair Genes. https://
www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCHlhmX9Bio 39. LA Times on 5G. http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-
44. Smart Meters—not so Smart – How Dangerous and Expensive Became “Smart” – An Exposé of the “Smart Grid”, Amy Worthingtonhttp://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/smart-meters-not-so-smart/
45. Half of Teenagers Addicted to Smart Phones http://www.cnn. com/2016/05/03/health/teens-cell-phone-addiction-parents/
Public Exposure: DNA, Democracy and the Wireless Revolution (2001)
Full Signal: The Hidden Cost of Cell Phones (2011) Resonance: Beings of Frequency (2013) Take Back Your Power (2013)
Mobilize (2014, 2016)
EMF Exposure Assessment
International Institute for Building BiologyTMand Ecology trains environmental consultants in home assessment and remediation, including regarding exposures to multiple types of electromagnetic fields. Consultants have varying levels of experience. See directory at www.hbelc.org
Industrial hygienists work in corporate and industrial settings, and have different degrees of experience in EMF assessment and remediation. See American Industrial Hygiene Association. www.aiha.org
Many activists and health educators have developed competence in EMF assessment and remediation, and may be all one needs to make impactful changes to support health, though they may have no formal training or technical degree. See health advocacy groups associated with the International EMF Alliance at www.iemfa.org to find local groups who may be able to help you. To buy a meter, and for other assessment and remediation supplies, go to www.EMFSafetyStore.com
Supporting Our Work
Thank you for taking the time to read The Wireless Elephant in the Room. Would you be able to help us to print and widely distribute this booklet, such as to government officials, schools, health practitioners, churches and journalists?
We thank you wholeheartedly for any assistance you can offer. It is only through citizens at the grassroots becoming educated that we will be able to make progress at the federal level, where critical changes to protect human health, animals and nature must take place. We are grateful for whatever you can give.
Please send contributions to the 501(c)(3) non-profit National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy at 1400 16th Street, NW, Suite 101, Washington, DC 20036. Earmark your donation for the ‘EMF Education Project’. Or, consider donating online via: http://manhattanneighbors.org/we-donate/
If you would consider making a major gift or bequest, please contact Camilla Rees at 415-992-5093 orCamilla@ManhattanNeighbors.org.
Thank you very much for your support.
Center photo and put quote below it on back cover—don’t know what here and page before the line above is—can you remove..I cant seem to be able to remove them
Why should we, in essence, be agreeing to be the collateral damage of the wireless industry’s
misguided values that are damaging humans,
Why should we, in essence, be agreeing to be the collateral
damage of the wireless industry’s misguided values
animals and nature, and especially children, on an
that are damaging humans, animals and nature,unpreancdedesepnetceiadllyscahilled,refno,rotnhaeniruncpormecmederncteidalscgaalei,n?
You could imagine feeling like a kid again. There is more than stress involved in that feeling of being “off”.
No matter what you do, you can’t loose weight
The world seems to be loosing it’s charm to be able to renew us. (No it isn’t them.)
Your batteries don’t recharge
The reasons aren’t obvious
What has changed so much? For one, we are an accumulation of a few generations of bad habits that don’t support us. Plus a bunch of new cultural changes that don’t work.
As a culture, we believe factory built chemicals can sustain us.
Our drinking water is heavily tainted with drugs, killing even its healthy neighbors
The air which used to be regenerative is full of exhaust, pollution, and chemtrails
The earth is warming up under us like it’s in a microwave . .er . . . and . . . it is in one.
Competing signals like EMF are like our own body’s signals but they can tangle
Our regenerative resources are not replenishing fast enough and being removed more quickly without regard to what our natural bodies need
OUR FOCUS ON WHAT OUR BODIES NEED MUST BE CONSTANT
Our soil, air, water and magnetic energies are clogged with EMF type broadcasts that stop our systems from receiving the regenerative signals we used to receive. Our own body’s wireless system works similarly and we can get lost in what is our own. We need to sort that out. We won’t be able to drive cars with heavy doses of wireless and have our health survive. (Even Nicola Tesla had a plan) Nothing short of removal of clogging signals and adding regenerative signals will due. Begin to focus on what restores us.
EMF is radiation. Dr. Ruggiero is learning that our cells cells can be taught to sustain greater levels of radiation by finding organisms that are good at it and finding that they can teach our organisms. This is good! (And we have to wait for it). He drops hints.
First things first. We need to have the “teaching organisms” within us. That would be the ones in Bravo Yogurt. They set up a microbiome which will complete us and eventually teach us to protect ourselves. His new product is being patented and is not yet available. But we are putting the pieces together!! Here is what we know.
Bravo Yogurt is restorative to our bodies and increases the communication and function of our systems. The microbiome is what learns to become more resilient to radiation! We need to continue to build this Bravo microbiome and it’s communication network. Check here for more on Bravo Yogurt
The hints that Dr. Ruggiero is giving us is to use imuno, yogurt, and GABA topically 1 hour before going to sleep. This will build a microbiome on the skin, increase the movement within the skin and turns on the power.
Limit tech and turn off our wi-fi systems to cut unnecessary signals to our bodies. We can then protect our own communication network by having less signal.
One simple thing we can do . . . 1 hour before sleep
To increase restorative sleep and pull us out of “Shallow Sleep Syndrome” we use what we call “E-ZZZs” by taking 4 capsules 1 hour before bed it resets the metabolic restoration process in about 180 days. (Other ways to do a reset are GAPS diet and “give it all” exercise). The ingredients of E-ZZZs are melatonin, ashwaganda, 5-HTP, l-theonine, magnesium, zinc, arginine, and lysine. (Plus going to bed early). You are going to love the restorative properties it provides to our sleep, to your nervous system, and digestion! I received more energy, auto weight loss and restorative properties. Tell your body to re-make YOUR BODY into your best body ever. Keep the Light on.
Q. I’d like to know how I can buy the best milk to use for Bravo because I have an allergy to dairy.
A. The guideline for buying milk is to get the very best you can. Ultra-Pasteurized milk is damaged by the chemicals they process it with. Store bought Pasteurized is fine. There is a website called www.realmilk.com that has a locater for fresh milk in your area. Calling health food stores and checking local farmer’s markets are also very good.
Describe your dairy allergy. What it it like? Sometimes these allergies are a skin rash. Sometimes it is damage to the mucosa from foods, medications or toxins. Have you always had it? Ever since you were little?
It could be a casein allergy and you may be able to remove enough to be okay. Or it could be the stress of the cows that is influencing your body. Big farms keep cows helplessly enslaved, never seeing grass, sky or a tree. Loved and looked after cows are better. They are herd animals. They are aware of each other in groups up and down streets. If everyone of their herd is enslaved, it causes unfathomable despair. It is important to find the right milk.
Raw milk has the advantage of being full fat with no processing or additives. Then we can “home pasteurize” it skim off the casein and avoiding the processing. I think of it as my white gesso canvas. Ready for some art.
We pasteurize by heating it to about 170 degrees F. Then we cool it. It has to cool quickly because it can go bad if it is sitting around kind of warm. I use an ice bath to cool it more quickly. When it is cool to body temp, there is a skin that comes up to the top. This is casein and many people are sensitive to it. Casein is removed by skimming off the film that rises to the top of the milk. If you remove that skin, most of the casein and stress hormones are removed and that is when we add the cultures.
Another important point about the milk is that the immune system is installed through the process of the baby’s gut being open, safe, and happy. Ready and very well equipped for new growth. When I ask people how their breast feeding went, 100% tell me a sad story. I believe this sad story has been going on for a long time. For me, my sad story was difficult to express as a 2 month old. It came out something like, “Whaaaaaa”. I had internalized the rage because that is how I was handled and how the rage was handled. I was trying my best to say “I can’t live and grow on this formula stuff you are giving me.” Where is my customized, loved packets of love filled with growth and promise that I can build my life out of? I was shocked to see that formula was made from corn syrup.
When I met Bravo Yogurt, it was like introducing the part that I have been raging for. It completely satisfied that part. Wow. What a gift. Whatever I had needed to build these functions inside me was satisfied. It was amazing. I opened up like a flower that finally got fertilized. I LOVED Bravo Yogurt and I have kept opening up all these years. (6 at the time of this writing).
So I am never going to say that you and yours, don’t need Bravo Yogurt. That would be foolish. However, it does need to be made in a way that supports what it is doing. You want the best milk for the best result.
Now, about that allergy. I am certain that rebounding to your immune system through gut mucosa and yogurt may be difficult. But it is absolutely worth a try. If you can’t take it internally, you can try to use it in other ways.
1. On the skin. Do you know what a happy plump milk feed baby feels like? Their skin is so soft and hydrated. THIS . . . Is what my skin feels like when I apply yogurt as a lotion to it every day. I head out to my shower with an ounce of yogurt in a cup. When I am done, I apply the yogurt to my skin. You should really be doing your face, hands and neck a second time per day. It is amazing. It fills the skin with a microbiome thickens it and pulls the skin together into strength.
These same microbiome that does all the immunity work can do it from your skin. We have had chemically sensitive girls do it on their skin. If you take antibiotics, it will kill your gut flora but if it is on the skin, you are still fine. Unless it is topical antibiotic.
The skin is also an organ of detoxification as is the colon, liver, kidneys, lungs, etc. So being able to release toxins and waste from our bodies really helps us to circulate and feel better. Then the emotions and thoughts come around. I have a question for you.
Are negative thoughts really just toxins in the body? Bravo is very good at cleaning.
Edestiny is a cute way of naming a product which contains a protein called “Edestin”. In the video below, you will hear Dr. Ruggiero speaking at the Autism One 2020. (It is not public so keep the link). He says … Continue reading →
I’d like to know how I can best use Bravo. I have a Dairy Allergy.
Describe your dairy allergy. Sometimes it is like a skin rash, or so. Sometimes it is antibiotic damage to the mucosa. Have you always had it? Ever since you were little?
Sometimes it is the stress of the cows. Big farms, helpless to being enslaved. Never seeing grass, sky or a tree. Loved and looked after cows are very important and the stress of living on a milking machine is to me “slavery”. These are herd animals. They are aware of those nearby. Up and down the streets. If everyone of their herd is enslaved, it causes unfathomable despair. It is important to find the right milk.
The answer to your question about best use is to find the best loved cows and milk you can.
Get the milk raw, meaning, full fat and no additives. The doctor’s only instructions are the lowest bar which is “no ultra-pasteurized milk”. We will pasteurize it ourselves. Thus avoiding the processing.
Secondly, many people are sensitive to the casein. Casein is removed when the pasteurization is cooled down and a skin is formed. If you remove that skin, most of the casein and stress hormones is removed. It becomes a clean canvas for the powders to culture in. We put the cultures in when it is at body temperature.
Another important point about the milk is that the immune system is installed through the process of the baby’s gut being open, safe, and happy. Ready and very well equipped for new growth. When I ask people how their breast feeding went, 100% tell me a sad story. I believe this sad story has been going on since then. For me, my sad story was difficult to express as a 2 month old. It came out something like, “Whaaaaaa”. I had internalized the rage because that is how I was handled and how the rage was handled. I was trying my best to say “I can’t live and grow on this stuff you are giving me.” Where is my customized, loved packets of love filled with growth and promise that I can build my life out of? You know, that stuff that adjusts to the baby when they change, when they are under the weather, and that progress as the fats and proteins are needed. That stuff!! Not for me. I got 2 months and then. . . .I got on corn syrup. I was well aware that I did poorly on it.
When I met Bravo Yogurt, it was like introducing the part that I have been raging for. It completely satisfied that part that needed to build these functions inside me. It was amazing. I opened up like a flower that finally got fertilized. I LOVED Bravo Yogurt and I have kept opening up all these years. (6 at the time of this writing).
So I am never going to say that you and yours, don’t need Bravo Yogurt. That would be foolish. However, it does need to be made in a way that supports what it is doing. You can’t really get the result without the proper milk. Check your area for real milk. (www.realmilk.com has a locator that could help)
Now, about that allergy. I am certain that rebounding to your immune system through gut mucosa and yogurt may be difficult. But it is absolutely worth a try. If you can’t take it internally, you can still use it in other ways.
1. On the skin. Do you know what a happy plump milk feed baby feels like? Their skin is so soft and hydrated. THIS!!! Is what my skin feels like when I apply yogurt as a lotion to it. It’s hard to get to the skin surface. I haven’t done it well in a while. Usually I have my dose, take the balance out of my cup and apply it to my face and neck but we can do so much better! Before your shower, head out and take a few spoonfuls into a cup or bowl and take it to the bathroom. When you are done with your shower or bath, apply the yogurt to your skin. You should really be doing this twice per day. It is amazing. It fills the skin with a microbiome. The same microbiome that does all the immunity work. If you don’t know the skin relates to the brain. In The Biology of Belief, Bruce Lipton talks about the cell membrane being the brain of the cell. That makes our “cell membrane” or the skin, our brain and what we think of as the brain is just the storage. Hydration and function of the brain go a very long way.
The skin is also an organ of detoxification as is the colon, liver, kidneys, lungs, etc. So being able to release toxins, waste from our bodies and our lives and … emotions too: that is all a function of the detox system.
Dr. R wrote a chapter on electromagnetic fields & cancer in 2001
Our skin acts as an antenna
5G is absorbed by the dermatologic cells
Our bodies are 90% microbiome and 10% human cells
This introduced how EMF interacted with both human & microbiome
“5G APOCALYPSE – The Extinction Event” recommended on YouTube
Research is cited that 5G stimulates DNA in cell nuclei to create coronavirus
Some celebrities created info-war and the real research was retracted
They measured deaths in states with and without 5G and found a difference
“We came up with a way to protect ourselves from EMF using microbiome”
Scientific American, in Oct, 2020 states “We have no reason to believe that 5G is safe”
We filed a patent describing how we can protect ourselves from EMF
Dr. Ruggiero says, “ We have developed a technology where we can exploit the ability of certain types of microbes to withstand enormous amounts of damage inflicted by EMFs, whether ionizing radiation or non-ionizing radiation, 5G, radio waves, whatever.
The microbes transfer their ability to quantum entanglement of DNA to the microbes of our microbiome and these transfer this acquired resistance or ability to repair the damage to our human cells.
In this way, our human cells become capable of withstanding damage inflicted by EMFs
The lethal dose of radiation for humans is 3 grays
Microbes have a number of molecular mechanisms that allow them to withstand radiation of up to 6,400 grays
The microbes can reduce reactive oxygen species & inhibit damage to DNA
The microbes are also incredibly efficient in DNA repair mechanisms
We can transfer their skills from the organisms, to the microbiome, & to us!
Do EMFs cause damage to our neurological functions? Yes!
He goes on for 20 mins talking about how to balance all this using the mechanisms and how it works and how to fix it. (mind-blowing work!)